Therefore, the respondent's motion to compel the petitioner to answer the discovery request was denied. The respondent's discovery request, that the petitioner produce copies of OATH's decisions in cases brought by the petitioner in comparable cases, constituted a request for legal research of material which is available to each party at OATH's offices. Where the respondent moved to compel discovery sought in support of an affirmative defense, the administrative law judge, in considering the motion to compel, ruled that the affirmative defense did not lie and therefore denied the motion to compel. In a civil rights enforcement proceeding, based on disability discrimination, the administrative law judge granted respondents' motion to compel discovery of complainant's medical records because the complainant placed her health in issue. 28, 2006), modified on penalty, Comm'r Dec. Those witnesses were excluded pursuant to the collateral matter rule, which precludes the introduction of extrinsic evidence to prove a collateral matter. MOTIONS TO COMPEL DISCLOSUREĪLJ ordered petitioner to produce two witnesses requested by respondent who were present during the incident which formed the basis of the charges she excluded four witnesses respondent requested to testify about miscellaneous uncharged conduct allegedly committed by petitioner's main witness. 17, 1990), modified as to penalty, Comm'r Dec. Dep't of Housing Preservation and Development v. Unexcused delay in bringing a discovery motion can be sufficient basis without more for denial of the motion. Where the information available without the benefit of discovery is inadequate to trial preparation on critical factual issues, discovery is essential. In general, discovery is far less extensive in administrative adjudication than in modern civil litigation, and the administrative law judge is vested by this section with broad discretion in overseeing discovery. The benefits of discovery - for instance, in shaping or limiting the issues for trial - should outweigh the costs, burdens, and time associated with the discovery, and the timeliness of a request for discovery is also relevant. (May 10, 2007).Įxtensive production demands made only days before the hearing are untimely pursuant to this rule. A party has two options: bring the matter to the attention of the trial judge or make an objection and allow the adversary to present the matter to the judge. Pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, an objection to a discovery request shall be made as promptly as possible, but no later than the time for an answer to that request. The recipient of a discovery request must alert her adversary when she does not intend to disclose the requested material. Parties should disclose all evidence relevant to the case and all information reasonably calculated to lead to relevant evidence.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |